Legal Opinion
Ring v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1970No. Civ. 34465PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, J.
Appellant Ring’s license as real estate broker, and that of appellant Friedman as real estate salesman, having been revoked by respondent, they unsuccessfully sought a peremptory writ of mandate ordering each such license restored. They appeal from the judgment denying the writ. On November 22, 1967, appellants entered pleas of nolo contendere to two counts of an indictment charging violations of the Corporate Securities Act (Corp. Code, § 26104, subd. (a)), to wit, sales to two persons of certain corporate stock without a permit. In addition to being fined, each appellant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Shakin v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Buckley v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Golde v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Cooper v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Arneson v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Trotta v. Department of Employment SecurityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Dresser v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.