Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1949No. 34,878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff below appeals from a judgment entered for defendants notwithstanding a verdict for $900.

In endeavoring to avoid a collision with the truck of defendant Jewel Tea Company, plaintiff’s truck, driven by one Arthur W. Paulson, loaded with six tons of lime, struck a telephone pole, which caused the truck to overturn. Plaintiff brought suit to recover for damage to his truck. He alleged that defendant Clara Hoskins, a saleslady driving a light truck for the Jewel company, entered the highway from a gas-station service road going in the same direction as plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Mahowald v. BeckrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Auger v. RofshusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Fulsom v. EgnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Otto v. SellnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API