Peterson v. Jewel Tea Co. Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff below appeals from a judgment entered for defendants notwithstanding a verdict for $900.
In endeavoring to avoid a collision with the truck of defendant Jewel Tea Company, plaintiff’s truck, driven by one Arthur W. Paulson, loaded with six tons of lime, struck a telephone pole, which caused the truck to overturn. Plaintiff brought suit to recover for damage to his truck. He alleged that defendant Clara Hoskins, a saleslady driving a light truck for the Jewel company, entered the highway from a gas-station service road going in the same direction as plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Medved v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Mahowald v. BeckrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Auger v. RofshusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Fulsom v. EgnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Otto v. SellnowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.