Legal Opinion

Fulsom v. Egner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1956No. 36,939PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion of the defendant, Bussell F. Egner, for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial.

This is an action involving a claim by the plaintiffs, Lyle Fulsom and Amy Fulsom, against the defendant for money deposited with him as their real estate agent under an earnest money contract entered into by the Fulsoms as vendors and one Fredrikka J. Hanson as vendee. The earnest money contract was subsequently cancelled out by the Fulsoms because of nonperformance on the part of Mrs.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Francis v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Schneider v. the Texas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Trovatten v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Meemken v. O'HARASupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Krueger v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. In Re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion CasesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Hiedeman v. HiedemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Swanson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API