Legal Opinion

Medved v. Doolittle

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1945No. Nos. 34,007, 34,008PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

■ This is an action for wrongful death brought only for the sole benefit of decedent’s minor daughter, notwithstanding the fact that decedent’s husband also survived her. After verdict for plaintiff, defendants moved for judgment non obstante. They appeal from the judgment entered after denial of their motions.

The fatal accident occurred on December 22, 1943, at about four o’clock in the afternoon, daylight-saving time, on the part of highway No. 8 known as the Minneapolis-Forest Lake Cutoff. The highway has three paved lanes, each nine feet wide. At about 11 o’clock on the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Bonhiver v. GraffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Hillyard v. Utah By-Products Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mitchell v. BranchHawaii Supreme Court · 1961

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API