Legal Opinion
Johnson Electric Co. v. Salce Contracting Associates, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 17, 2002No. AC 21509PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
Our Unfair Trade Practices Act, General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. (CUTPA),1 provides a remedy for a person who has sustained an ascertainable loss as a result of conduct that is immoral, unethical, oppressive or unscrupulous. The CUTPA claimant in this case *344is a subcontractor that was denied a subcontract even though the subcontractor had been named in the successful bid proposal of the general contractor. An attorney trial referee, relying on his extensive findings of fact, issued a report concluding that the subcontractor had proven a CUTPA violation. The trial court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Gervais v. Riddle & Associates, P.C.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Votto v. American Car Rental, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Giametti v. Inspections, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.