Legal Opinion
American Promotional Events, Inc. v. Blumenthal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 22, 2008No. SC 17868PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the trial court correctly concluded that a firework known and marketed as “Piccolo Pete” is a “foun tain” within the meaning of General Statutes § 29-356 1 and, therefore, exempt from the general prohibition against fireworks contained in General Statutes § 29-357. 2 The plaintiff, American Promotional Events, Inc., doing business as TNT Fireworks, brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief after the named defendant, Richard Blumenthal, the attorney general of the state of Connecticut, 3 issued a cease and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- In Re Jorden R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Boyne v. Town of GlastonburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. AmaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.