Legal Opinion
First Union National Bank v. Hi Ho Mall Shopping Ventures, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 12, 2005No. SC 17151PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The plaintiff, First Union National Bank, brought this action to foreclose municipal tax hens recorded against a property in Bridgeport that is owned by the defendant state of Connecticut (state)1 and is used as part of the campus of Housatonic *289Community College. The state appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motion to dismiss, in which it claimed that General Statutes § 49-312 does not waive sovereign immunity so as to permit the foreclosure of the state’s ownership of real property. We agree with the state’s interpretation of § 49-31, and, therefore, we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lebron v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Envirotest Systems Corp. v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Manning v. Mining & Minerals Division of the Energy, Minerals, & Natural Resources DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.