State v. Lutters
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a taxicab falls within the “place of business” exception to the offense of carrying a pistol without a permit contained in General Statutes § 29-35 (a).2 The *201defendant, John Lutters, was charged in a one count information with carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of § 29-35 (a). Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the information, claiming that, although he had possessed a handgun without a permit as alleged, he had done so while operating a taxicab in which he had a proprietary interest, and,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Dalevonte Davelle HearnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- American Promotional Events, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.