Legal Opinion

State v. Lutters

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 20, 2004No. SC 16982PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a taxicab falls within the “place of business” exception to the offense of carrying a pistol without a permit contained in General Statutes § 29-35 (a).2 The *201defendant, John Lutters, was charged in a one count information with carrying a pistol without a permit in violation of § 29-35 (a). Prior to trial, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the information, claiming that, although he had possessed a handgun without a permit as alleged, he had done so while operating a taxicab in which he had a proprietary interest, and,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Dalevonte Davelle HearnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. American Promotional Events, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API