Legal Opinion

Eller v. North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 1, 1931PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogdeN, J.

The case presents this situation: Hoke Street in the city of Burlington is an improved and paved street. The tracks of defendant crossed this street at grade. Park Avenue, a paved and improved street, is on the south side of the tracks. The plaintiff approached this crossing, without stopping, although he looked and listened and neither heard nor saw a train. The side curtains were up. When he came in line with Park Avenue, a distance of 40 or 50 feet from the track, he had a clear sweep of unobstructed vision for at least 300 to 400 yards, except for the fact that a car crossing the tracks…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Herman v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Beck v. HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Beck v. . HooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API