Coleman v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Motions to nonsuit were overruled and following issues submitted:
1. Was the plaintiff injured by the negligence of the defendant as alleged in the complaint?
2. Did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his own injury?
3. What damage is the plaintiff entitled to recover?
The jury answered the first issue "Yes," the second issue "No," and the third issue, "Four thousand dollars."
From the judgment rendered, defendant appealed. The plaintiff was injured while in the act of crossing defendant's track driving a horse and buggy at a public crossing at Fair Bluff, by coming in collision…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Trull v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.