Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stagy, O. J.
On considering a motion to nonsuit under the Hinsdale Act, C. S., 567, or a demurrer to the evidence, it is established by numerous decisions:
1. That the evidence which makes for plaintiff’s claim, or tends to support his cause of action, is to be taken in its most favorable light for thé plaintiff, and he is “entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence, and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.” Dickerson v. Reynolds, 205 N. C., 770, 172 S. E., 402; Jones v. Bagwell, ante, 378; Nash v. Boyster, 189 N. C., 408, 127 S. E., 356.
2. That mere…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Cox v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Fitzgerald v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Clark v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.