Legal Opinion

Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1929PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The first main assignment of error by the defendant was to the refusal of the court below at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, and at the close of all the evidence, to dismiss the action or for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. This assignment of error cannot be sustained.

As often repeated: “It is the settled rule of practice and the accepted position in this jurisdiction that, on a motion to nonsuit, the evidence which makes for the plaintiff’s claim, and which tends to support her cause of action, whether offered by the plaintiff or elicited from the defendant’s witnesses, will…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  4. Earwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Mesic v. Atlantic & North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Houston v. City of MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Eller v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Mosley & Mosley Builders, Inc. v. Landin Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Dawson v. Seashore Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API