Legal Opinion

Beck v. Hooks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1940PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Appellants stress for error tbe refusal of the court below to grant their motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of all the evidence — they having reserved exception to refusal to allow such motion at close of plaintiff’s evidence — upon two grounds: (1) Lack of sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury on the issue of negligence, in support of which they rely upon Hughes v. Luther, 189 N. C., 841, 128 S. E., 145; Stallings v. Transport Co., 210 N. C., 201, 185 S. E., 643. (2) Contributory negligence of plaintiff' — in support of which they invoke the principles enunciated in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Cole v. KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Cole v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Tyson v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API