Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Sink

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 30, 1937PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The case was here before, 210 N. C., 815, on demurrer to the complaint, C. S., 511. It is here now on demurrer to the evidence, C. S., 567. The two are not the same in purpose or result. One challenges the sufficiency of the pleading; the other the sufficiency of the evidence.

In negligence cases, it is proper to sustain a demurrer to the evidence and to enter judgment of nonsuit:

1. When all tbe evidence, taken in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, fails to show any actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. Love v. Asheville, 210 N. C., 476, 187 S. E., 562; Cheek v.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API