Legal Opinion

Herman v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We fail to discern from the record any evidence of negligence on the part of the railroad company which contributed to the plaintiff’s injury. Even if the engineer or fireman did fail to ring the bell or sound the whistle, of which there is only negative testimony with positive evidence to the contrary, still the defendant had a right to operate the train over its track, and the negligence of the driver of the automobile is so palpable and gross, as shown by plaintiff’s own witnesses, as to render his negligence the sole proximate cause of the injury. Construction Co. v. R. R., 184 N. C.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. West Construction Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Murray v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API