Legal Opinion

Ralston Purina Co. v. Carter

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1962No. Civ. 115PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.—

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff allowing recovery for the balances due on promissory notes. The appellant-defendant, H. G. Carter, has been held liable in his capacity as guarantor of John Richards, a nonappealing defendant, for $7,616.33 principal, $1,642.57 interest, $2,537.55 attorneys’ fees and $349.80 costs.

In the complaint filed April 24, 1959, the respondent set forth 20 causes of action based on “Delivery Receipts and Notes,’’ each of which was signed and executed by defendant John Richards. The 21st cause of action was based upon a written guaranty…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Guillory v. GodfreyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glickman v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Developers Small Business Investment Corp. v. HoeckleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Coutin v. NessanbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Wexler v. McLucasAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1975
  5. Bank of New England, N.A. v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API