Legal Opinion

Developers Small Business Investment Corp. v. Hoeckle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1968No. 21849PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves an action on a guaranty executed by the appellees individually, (hereafter “Appellees”). This action was grounded for jurisdiction on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This court’s jurisdiction rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

Two questions are involved, (1) whether the law of New Jersey or California applies, and (2) whether under applicable law, the holder of a guaranty may enforce its obligation by an action on the guaranty without first exhausting its security under a deed of trust secured by a separate note also held by the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Helene Marceau Sidebotham v. W. L. Robison, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Sidebotham, Deceased, and Robert Sidebotham and James SidebothamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Bernkrant v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bonanno v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Connolly Data Systems, Inc. v. Victor Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1987
  2. American Re-Insurance Co. v. INSURANCE COM'N, ETC.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
  3. United California Bank v. MaltzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Lumia v. Roper Pump Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
  5. First Pennsylvania Bank, N. A. v. LugliDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API