Legal Opinion
Wexler v. McLucas
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided May 1, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 13524PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARSHALL, J.
The plaintiff secured a judgment against defendant for $308.29, with attorney’s fees in the amount of $80, $17.07 interest and costs. Defendant appeals. We deem the appeal meritorious.
In 1971, Floyd E. McLucas, the son of the defendant, wished to purchase furniture from plaintiff’s assignor but was told that more than his signature and that of his wife was required on the “Security Agreement.” (This is actually a contract of sale as well as a “security agreement.”) He therefore brought a friend, James McWilliams, to the *Supp. 11store who signed the agreement; but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Lasky v. BewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. OsborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Peerless Glass Co. v. Pacific Crockery & Tinware Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Charles H. Alberding v. Everett S. M. Brunzell and Dana Brunzell, Charles H. Alberding v. Everett S. M. Brunzell and Dana BrunzellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. OstlieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State Board of Equalization v. CarletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990