Legal Opinion

Glickman v. Collins

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1975No. L.A. 30353PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Defendant Hilda Collins appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff Claire Glickman in the sum of $8,852.80 plus attorneys fees and costs found by the court to be due under an agreement wherein defendant guaranteed the obligation of plaintiff’s former husband Gerald Glickman to make alimony and child support payments to plaintiff. Defendant contends that the agreement is void as against public policy because it was intended to induce plaintiff to divorce Mr. Glickman. Alternatively she contends that the agreement was without consideration and that plaintiff did not…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. De Burgh v. De BurghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. In Re Marriage of DawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Homedics, Inc. v. Valley Forge Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. In Re Marriage of Pendleton & FiremanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API