Legal Opinion

Coutin v. Nessanbaum

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1971No. Civ. 36988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HERNDON, J.

Appellant brought this action to recover from respondent the unpaid balance on a promissory note of which respondent’s son-in-law, Frank Zarider, was the maker. Respondent guaranteed payment of the note by written instrument under circumstances hereinafter described.

The trial court concluded that respondent “was exonerated of her obligations” under the guaranty by reason of appellant’s conduct in compromising his claim against the principal debtor and in executing instruments by the terms of which he agreed that his acceptance of the payments therein recited would…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Reid v. Overland Machined ProductsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ralston Purina Co. v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Garfield v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. McMannus v. Temple Estate Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Pearl v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. ITT Diversified Credit Corp. v. Highlands InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Gray1 CPB, LLC v. KolokotronisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API