Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Donovan

United States Court of International Trade

Decided June 6, 1984No. Court 81-1-00028PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Plaintiffs' Motion for Review of Administrative Determination upon Agency Record

RE, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs, on behalf of former employees at the Dana Corporation’s Marion, Indiana plant (Marion plant), challenge the Secretary of Labor’s denial of certification of eligibility for worker adjustment assistance benefits under the Trade Act of 1974. 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1976 & Supp. V 1981). The Secretary’s denial is part of a multiple determination on the petition for certification filed by the Marion plant employees. In his determination, the Secretary certified only the workers “engaged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Local 167, International Molders & Allied Workers' Union ex rel. Group of Aggrieved Workers v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  5. John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Stidham v. United States Department of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Former Employees of Marathon Ashland Pipeline, LLC v. ChaoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  5. Former Employees of Chevron Products Co. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API