Legal Opinion
Woodrum v. Donovan
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 10, 1983No. Court 80-12-00105PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Plaintiffs’ Motion Pursuant to Rule 56.1 for Review of Administrative Determination upon Agency Record
RE, Chief Judge:
In this action, plaintiffs, on behalf of the former employees of Capital Chrysler Plymouth of Montgomery, Inc., of Montgomery, West Virginia, challenge a determination by the Secretary of Labor denying them certification of eligibility for benefits under the worker adjustment assistance program of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1976). In substance, the Secretary found that plaintiffs were service workers employed by a firm that did not produce an article…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Julian R. Woodrum, Dennis Dorsey and Sherman Johnson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Former Employees of Hawkins Oil & Gas, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.