Legal Opinion

John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATES

United States Customs Court

Decided September 18, 1972No. C.D. 4377; Protest 69/30840PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Judge: *

The substantive legal question presented in this case pertains to the lawful and proper import duty to be levied upon certain merchandise imported from Hong Kong.

The merchandise, invoiced as “Pflueger Hande-Pak”, consists of lithographed tin containers with forty assorted-sized fish hooks. The fish hooks and the tin sheets were manufactured in the United States and were shipped to Hong Kong. In Hong Kong the tin sheets were cut and shaped into containers. The fish hooks, which were sorted as to size prior to being shipped to Hong Kong, were then packaged into the tin containers.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  2. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982
  3. Estate of Finkel v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  4. Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  5. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API