Legal Opinion
Woodrum v. Donovan
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 26, 1982No. Court 80-12-00105PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
In this action, plaintiffs, on behalf of the former employees of a new car dealership, seek review of a final determination by the Secretary of Labor that they are not eligible for trade adjustment assistance benefits under Subchapter II, Part 2 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2271-2322 (1976). The court, after reviewing the administrative record and the arguments of the parties, has concluded that the Secretary of Labor failed to comply with the procedural requirements of the statute and that these procedural irregularities prejudiced the rights of plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- National Juice Products Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Estate of Finkel v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Cherlin v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.