Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Donovan

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 9, 1983No. 81-1-00028PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Plaintiffs’ Motion for Review of Administrative Determination upon Agency Record

RE, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs, on behalf of former employees of the Dana Corporation’s Marion, Indiana plant, challenge a determination by the Secretary of Labor which denied them certification of eligibility for benefits under the worker adjustment assistance program of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1976 & Supp. IV 1980). In substance the Secretary found that only those workers in Departments 225 and 230, which produced journal crosses and bearing races, met the criteria for eligibility set forth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  3. United Shoe Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. Catherine Bedell, ChairmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  5. Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Estate of Finkel v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
  3. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API