Legal Opinion
Abbott v. Donovan
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 11, 1984No. Court 81-1-00028PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, on behalf of the former employees at the Dana Corporation’s Marion, Indiana plant (Marion plant), challenge a determination of the Secretary of Labor denying certification of eligibility for trade adjustment assistance benefits under the Trade Act of 1974. 19 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2487 (1982).
The Secretary’s denial is part of a multiple determination on the petition for certification filed by the Marion plant employees, in which only the employees in Departments 225 and 230, the departments that produced journal crosses and bearing races, were certified. Abbott v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Julian R. Woodrum, Dennis Dorsey and Sherman Johnson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Abbott v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Estate of Finkel v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Former Employees of CSX Oil and Gas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Former Employees of Shaw Pipe, Inc. v. U.S. Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Former Employees of Marathon Ashland Pipeline, LLC v. ChaoUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
- Former Employees of Kleinerts, Inc. v. HermanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.