Legal Opinion
Muller v. Tanner
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1969No. 25570PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
2 Cal.App.3d 438 (1969)
82 Cal. Rptr. 734
WILLIAM MULLER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
SYDNEY H. TANNER, Defendant and Respondent.
Docket No. 25570.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.
December 9, 1969.
COUNSEL
William Muller, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Sydney N. Tanner, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
SIMS, J.
Plaintiff has purported to appeal from a minute order entitled "Order Striking File From Court Records and Directing That No Further Proceedings Be Had." (1) The order, which is set forth below, operated to remove any cause of action…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Golin v. AllenbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In Re Liang-Houh ShiehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Camerado Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Hollister Canning Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Cox v. Superior Court of Amador CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.