Legal Opinion

Hollister Canning Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1972No. Civ. 30831PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

By its petition for writ of mandate and/or in the alternative writ of prohibition, the Hollister Canning Company sought an order staying proceedings in an action pending in the trial court until a peremptory writ could be granted herein ordering that court to set aside its order which granted the motion to strike the complaint as to the defendant “James E. Swett doing business as George E. Swett Company,” who, the order recites, was served as “Third Doe” in the proceedings below, and further ordering the trial court to subject “James E. Swett, an individual doing business as…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barnes v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Marasco v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Conway v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Conway v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Omega Video Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API