Legal Opinion

Camerado Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1993No. C014311PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Petitioner (defendant) seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent superior court to set aside its order denying defendant’s motion for security, brought pursuant to the vexatious litigant statute. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391 et seq.; further statutory references to sections of an undesignated code are to the Code of Civil Procedure.)

While represented by counsel, real party in interest, individually and doing business as two unincorporated sole proprietorships (hereafter plaintiff), sued defendant and several others who are not party to this original proceeding, alleging…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Taliaferro v. HoogsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. First Western Development Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Brailsford v. BlueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Forrest v. Department of CorporationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Fresno County Department of Children & Family Services v. R.H.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Holcomb v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Flores v. GeorgesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API