Legal Opinion

Wulfjen v. Dolton

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1944No. L. A. No. 18895PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The propriety of the trial court’s conclusion that the maintenance of a prior action was ground for abatement of this action governs the disposition of this appeal.

On February 15, 1940, plaintiff herein filed an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (the prior action) against O. L. Dolton, Jr., Lindley W. Potts, Helen King and Concrete Homes Corporation, a corporation. By her amended complaint therein plaintiff alleged that the individual defendants were the organizers and promoters of the defendant corporation and that such defendants at all times mentioned “held the majority…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bancroft v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Bingham v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Quirk v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hjorth v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API