Legal Opinion
Golin v. Allenby
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 2010No. H032619PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*621Opinion
DUFFY, J.
Appellants Jeffrey R. Golin and Elsie Y. Golin (collectively, the Golins) appeal from the dismissal of this action after the trial court determined them to be vexatious litigants under Code of Civil Procedure section 391, subdivision (b)(2) and (3),1 and they failed to post a $500,000 bond to continue the litigation under sections 391.3 and 391.4. The Golins contend that the order must be reversed because it found them to be vexatious litigants even though they did not meet the statutory criteria for this finding. They further contend that the order must be reversed because it…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Marriage of Rifkin & CartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Garcia v. LaceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Elonza Tyler v. Mike KnowlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Goodrich v. Sierra Vista Regional Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.