Legal Opinion

Neal v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1949No. Civ. 16844PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

The original complaint in this action, which named the Bank of America as sole defendant, attempted to state three causes of action, in substance as follows:

First: Plaintiff had entered into separate written contracts with Milan and Zella Babcock and with Jack and Barbara Lease to construct homes for them for agreed prices of $9,500 and $9,283 respectively, payable in stated installments during the course of construction, the final payment of 20 per cent to be upon expiration of the lien period; the Babcocks and Leases had negotiated building loans with the defendant Bank of America, to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Zakaessian v. ZakaessianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Hays v. TempleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Williamson v. JoyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Wilson v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lee v. HensleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Ray v. HanischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Hills Transportation Co. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API