Millhouse v. Wiesenthal
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether the determination of causation in an appellate legal malpractice case is a question of law or a question of fact. This is an issue of first impression in Texas. G. Ste-fane Millhouse II1 brought suit against his former attorney, Ronald G. Wiesenthal, for damages caused by Wiesenthal’s failure to timely file a statement of facts with the court of appeals in an earlier case in which Wiesenthal had represented Millhouse. The trial court granted Wiesenthal’s motion for summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law that Wiesenthal’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Phillips v. ClancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Edwards v. Kaye, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Mandell v. Hamman Oil and Refining Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- MacKie v. McKenzie, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.