Legal Opinion

Sturgis v. Skokos

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 5, 1998No. CR 98-299PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This appeal concerns an action for attorney malpractice. The appellants, Andrew and Vanessia Sturgis, alleged that the appellees, Theodore C. Skokos and Randy Coleman, mishandled the Sturgises’ defense and counterclaim in a Jefferson County foreclosure action that originated in 1988. The Sturgises filed their malpractice action in the Pulaski County Circuit Court in 1995. With one exception, all of the acts of negligence were alleged to have occurred more than three years earlier. The exception was an allegation of failure to timely lodge the record in the foreclosure…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. McQuay v. GuntharpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Millhouse v. WiesenthalTexas Supreme Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Reichert v. STATE EX REL. McCULLOCHMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cole v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Heating & Air Specialists, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. McDonald v. PettusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Governmental Interinsurance Exchange v. JudgeIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API