Legal Opinion

Daugert v. Pappas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1985No. 51147-1PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

This case involves a legal malpractice claim against an attorney for failure to file timely a petition for review with this court of a Court of Appeals decision. The issues presented concern the proper standard for determining proximate cause in a legal malpractice action. The trial court concluded that proximate cause was a question for the jury and instructed the jury to decide whether the attorney's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the client's loss and whether the client lost a chance to recover. We hold this was error and reverse.

The underlying suit upon which this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chocktoot v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Baker v. BealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Lewisville Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API