Mandell v. Hamman Oil and Refining Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAM BASS, Justice.
This appeal stems from a royalty suit to recover on a take or pay contract. The issue in this case is whether royalty owners are entitled to take or pay proceeds from a gas purchase contract. We hold that royalty owners are entitled to royalties for take or pay provisions, only if the parties expressly so provide in the lease.
Summary of Facts
In 1978, appellants and Hamman Oil and Refining Company (“Hamman”) executed three leases for 260 acres of land for oil and gas exploration. Paragraph 3(a) of the leases provided for royalties, as follows:(2) On gas, including…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Jackson v. Van WinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Lenape Resources Corp. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
- Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Vickery v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Texaco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
- Honeycutt v. Billingsley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.