Legal Opinion

Charles Reinhart Co. v. Winiemko

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1994No. Docket Nos. 94990, 94991, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

At issue in the instant case is whether proximate cause in a legal malpractice action alleging negligence during an appeal is an issue of law reserved for the court or an issue of fact reserved for the jury. More specifically, we are presented with the question whether a court or a jury should determine whether the underlying appeal would have been successful. We hold that the issue is reserved to the court because whether an appeal would have been successful intrinsically involves issues of law within the exclusive province of the judiciary. Furthermore, we find that the trial court failed…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Phillips v. Mirac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Sturgis v. SkokosSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Mahaffey v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API