Chocktoot v. Smith
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
Defendants, attorneys at law, appeal from a judgment in a malpractice action won by the personal representative of a decedent whom they had represented in an earlier proceeding. The case presents novel issues of procedure in legal malpractice litigation: Who, judge or jury, must decide whether an attorney’s negligence harmed his client, and upon what evidence, when the negligence concerned an issue decided by a court rather than a jury?
The course of events may be briefly summarized. Defendants represented Wesley Wendell Brown in a declaratory judgment proceeding in 1972 to determine whether…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Fuschetti v. BiermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.