Legal Opinion

Chocktoot v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1977No. TC 74-1773-L-3, SC 24607PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Defendants, attorneys at law, appeal from a judgment in a malpractice action won by the personal representative of a decedent whom they had represented in an earlier proceeding. The case presents novel issues of procedure in legal malpractice litigation: Who, judge or jury, must decide whether an attorney’s negligence harmed his client, and upon what evidence, when the negligence concerned an issue decided by a court rather than a jury?

The course of events may be briefly summarized. Defendants represented Wesley Wendell Brown in a declaratory judgment proceeding in 1972 to determine whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shields v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Fuschetti v. BiermanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API