Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central Railroad
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
GENE CARTER, Senior District Judge.
In its First Amended Complaint (Docket Item No. 21), Plaintiff Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. d/b/a Grimmel Industries (“Grimmel”) seeks a declaration of ownership rights to a railroad spur (Count I) and an injunction preventing destruction of the spur and interference with Grimmel’s right to repair, maintain, and use the spur (Count II). The First Amended Complaint further alleges unlawful refusal to provide rail service, in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11101…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alternative Energy, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Proctor & Gamble Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Medina-Claudio v. Commonwealth of PRCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Friberg v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Port City Properties v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- PCS Phosphate Co., Inc. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Maynard v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
- Mark Griffioen, Joyce Ludvicek, Mike Ludvicek, Sandra Skelton, and Brian Vanous, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company, Alliant Energy Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Union Pacific Corporation.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- A & W Properties, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.