Mark Griffioen, Joyce Ludvicek, Mike Ludvicek, Sandra Skelton, and Brian Vanous, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company, Alliant Energy Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Union Pacific Corporation.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Justice.
*277This case is yet another outgrowth from the terrible flooding that struck our state a decade ago. Property owners in Cedar Rapids have sued the owners of certain railroad bridges across the Cedar River, alleging that their misguided efforts to protect those bridges from washing out worsened the effects of the flooding for other property owners. We must decide whether the property owners' state-law damage claims against the railroad bridge owners are preempted by the Federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (ICCTA). See 49 U.S.C. § 10501(b) (2006). The ICCTA…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CSX Transp., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Angela Horton and Kevin Houser v. the Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2023
- Angela Horton and Kevin Houser v. the Kansas City Southern Railway CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2024
- BNSF Railway Company v. City of Edmond OklahomaDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2020
- Fontana v. CSX Transportation, Inc. and Oronzio v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (Consolidated)Superior Court of Delaware · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.