Legal Opinion
Port City Properties v. Union Pacific Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 10, 2008No. 19-3189PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Port City Properties, Inc. d/b/a Hodges Warehouse and Alpine Properties, LLC (collectively “Hodges”) appeal the district court’s denial of their request for a preliminary injunction against Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”). We affirm.
I
Hodges owns and operates a commercial public warehouse in an industrial park located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. An industrial rail track is routed through the park with rail service provided to Hodges’ warehouse via an additional private track owned by Hodges. After Union Pacific determined the industrial rail track servicing the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. 2121 East 30th StreetCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. v. EchoStar Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Pci Transportation, Inc. v. Fort Worth & Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Elam v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Westar Energy, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.California Supreme Court · 2017
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.