Legal Opinion
Maynard v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided March 12, 2004No. CIV.A. 01-211-DLBPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
BUNNING, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant CSX Transportation’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. # 53) Plaintiff having filed their response (Doc. # 57), to which defendant has filed its reply (Doc. # 62), oral argument on the motion having been conducted, and the defendant having supplemented its motion with an additional memorandum of law (Doc. # 66), this motion is ripe for review.
Also pending before the Court is third-party defendant AEP Kentucky Coal’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. # 67). Neither plaintiffs nor defendant having…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra K. Lenning v. Commercial Union Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Friberg v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- City of Auburn, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington v. The United States Government and the Surface Transportation Board, an Agency of the United States Government King County, a Washington Municipal Corporation Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware Corporation, City of Auburn, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington City of Yakima, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington City of Kent, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington v. U.S. Government the Surface Transportation Board, an Agency of the United States Government, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Acquisition, Inc. ("Bnsf Acquisition") and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company ("Bn/santa Fe"), Respondents-Intervenors. City of Auburn, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington v. U.S. Government the Surface Transportation Board, an Agency of the United States Government, and Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, Intervenors/respondentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Rushing v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Strasburg Scooters, LLC v. Strasburg Rail Rd., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Mark Griffioen, Joyce Ludvicek, Mike Ludvicek, Sandra Skelton, and Brian Vanous, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Cedar Rapids and Iowa City Railway Company, Alliant Energy Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, and Union Pacific Corporation.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- People v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- A & W Properties, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- Jones Creek Investors, LLC v. Columbia CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.