Legal Opinion
Chase v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 15, 2002No. 01-AA-260PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
The District of Columbia’s unemployment compensation law prevents an employee terminated for “gross misconduct” from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. Petitioner challenges the ruling of the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) that the basis of his discharge was gross misconduct. Because the Appeals Examiner failed to make sufficient findings, we are constrained to remand the case for further proceedings.
I. Facts
Petitioner worked for AIMCO/NHP as a maintenance technician at an apartment complex. On August 13, 2000, a Sunday, while petitioner was on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Giles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Long v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Smithsonian Institution v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Odeniran v. Hanley Wood, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Morris v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Badawi v. Hawk One Security, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Bowman-Cook v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hickey v. BOMERSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.