Legal Opinion
Hickey v. BOMERS
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 2011No. 09-AA-551, 09-AA-808PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Associate Judge:
On February 16, 2009, respondent Mary Bomers, having been discharged from work as a legal secretary for petitioner Robert Hickey, applied for unemployment compensation benefits. The District of Columbia Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) initially denied the claim on the basis of information provided by Hickey that Bomers had been an independent contractor rather than an employee. Bomers appealed that determination to the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”). After a hearing on April 17, 2009, the OAH Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found in an order…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Despina Spirides v. John E. Reinhardt, Director of United States International Communication AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Morrison v. International Programs Consortium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- District of Columbia v. HamptonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Schecter v. Merchants Home Delivery, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- District of Columbia Office of Tax & Revenue v. Bae System Enterprise System Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hamilton v. Hojeij Branded Food, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Michael Caison v. Project Support ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Scott v. Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- E.C. v. RCM of Washington, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.