Legal Opinion
Bowman-Cook v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 10, 2011No. 09-AA-608PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Petitioner Belynda Bowman-Cook seeks review of a decision by the Office of Administrative Hearings (“OAH”) that she was ineligible to receive immediate unemployment compensation benefits because she was terminated from her job with respondent Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) for conduct that constituted “other than gross misconduct.” 1 Because the factual findings made by the OAH administrative law judge (“ALJ”) were not adequate to support the determination that the conduct for which petitioner was terminated was intentional, and because…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rodriguez v. Filene's Basement Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Georgetown University Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Colton v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hamilton v. Hojeij Branded Food, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hickey v. BOMERSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Capitol Entertainment Services, Inc. v. McCormickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Savage-Bey v. La Petite AcademyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Scott v. Behavioral Research Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.