Legal Opinion
Long v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1990No. 88-913PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner seeks review of a Department of Employment Services (“DOES” or “Department”) decision holding her ineligible for unemployment compensation because she was discharged for “misconduct.” Unfortunately, the record is inadequate to permit us to perform our appellate review function. Accordingly, we must remand for further agency action.
I
The factual setting, briefly put, was as follows. Petitioner, then an employee of Potomac Electric Power Company (“PEP-CO”), filed a charge in the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights (“OHR”) on September 30, 1986,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Simpson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Children's Defense Fund v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Giles v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Berkley v. D.C. Transit, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Teamsters Local Union 1714 v. Public Employee Relations BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Chase v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.