Legal Opinion
Fennell v. AARP
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 16, 2011No. Civil Action 09-01976 (CKK)PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Charlie A. Fennell, Jr. (“Fennell”), a fifty-three-year-old black male, commenced this action pro se against his former employer, AARP, 1 alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., in connection with the termination of his employment from AARP. Presently before the Court is AARP’s [5] Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (“Motion to Dismiss”), which Fennell has opposed. Based upon the parties’ submissions, the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McNair v. D.C. Department of Employment ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Bowe-Connor v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.