Legal Opinion
Peters v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 16, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-2020PublishedCited by 127 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are nine current and former employees of the District of Columbia’s Child and Family Services Agency (“CFSA”), who assert that the CFSA “discriminated against them and similarly situated employees on the basis of their race, national origin, age, and/or in retaliation for complaining about discriminatory practices.” Second Amended Complaint (“Compl.”), ECF No. 17, at 2. As a consequence of CFSA’s alleged discriminatory and retaliatory actions, plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act…
2Cases cited163 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by127 opinions
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dudley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Mount v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.