Legal Opinion

Bowe-Connor v. Shinseki

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 24, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2010-2032PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiff Shelia S. Bowe-Connor (“Bowe-Connor” or “plaintiff’) brings this action against Eric K. Shinseki, in his capacity as the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, (“Secretary” or “defendant”) alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), and the Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) et seq. (“EPA”). Compl. ¶¶ 1, 2, 4, 8. The complaint — which was filed when Bowe-Connor was proceeding pro se — 1 generally contends…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. Page v. MancusoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Latson v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  5. Moore v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API