Legal Opinion

Caulder v. Waverly Mills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1985No. 258PA84PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

The employee-plaintiff, Clifton Caulder, was a textile worker his entire working life, the last thirteen years of which he was employed by defendant Waverly Mills. His claim is for workers’ compensation for incapacity to work caused by chronic obstructive lung disease. Concluding that Caulder’s lung disease was occupational and compensable and that he was last injuriously exposed to the hazards of the disease while working for Waverly Mills and while Employers Mutual Insurance Company was on the risk, the Industrial Commission awarded Caulder compensation for total disability…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. State v. KoberleinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Barber v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hardin v. Motor Panels, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Keel v. H & v. INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Gay v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Wilkins v. J.P. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API